What is Utilitarianism What are two objections to this view Essay

What is Utilitarianism What are two objections to this view - Essay ExampleThe man behind the Utilitarian concept is Jeremy Bentham and he weighed pastime and botheration as the consequence of ones own process. More precisely, Utilitarianism refers to a concept where in the equaliser of pleasure and pang is related to the course of do performed by a human being. According to this concept, altogether pleasure is adept and pain is bad. The Utilitarianism concept can be considered as one kind of consequentialism, where the joy is considered as the measuring tool to gauge the morality of an action. According to Bentham, only an action can be morally right if it brings utmost happiness to a person. If it is non bringing pleasure then the action is regarded to be wrong. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory which focuses on right and wrong based on an outcome of an action or a policy. This theory is not restricted around the interest of oneself but consider the nigh(a)ness of ot her too. mavin of the principles of utilitarianism is that it gives high importance to the role of pleasure and pain in our conduct. Secondly, it considers an action good or bad based on its consequences. Thirdly, this theory equates goodness with pleasure and bad with pain. Thirdly, it ac familiaritys pleasure and pain as a quantifiable emotion. Bentham has also attached some criteria to measure pain and pleasure handle intensity, certainty, nearness and duration. Moreover, the criterion of extent is used to quantify the actions which affect many numbers of people. Objections to Utilitarianism Objection One The one objection to Utilitarianism is that, life is not all about physical pleasure but the aspects same virtue, knowledge matters too. Is life a phenomenon, where action can be gauged with pleasure and pain seeking aroused element? Is it not core rich principle of ethics and morality the corner stone of life? It is satirical to think that one achieves physical pleasure b y conducting ethical and moral principles in life. personal pleasure cannot be regarded as an end to the mission of life. Moreover, virtue is accountable only if one performs self slight service which in turn is not a pleasure giving affect. Additionally, knowledge is simulated through pleasure but by hard work and by undergoing painful experiences. Here utilitarian concept cannot be applied as the objection proves that gains from pain taking experience are far to a greater extent valuable than actions which give only momentary physical pleasure. Response The response to the first objection is that, life should not be only concentrated and focused on physical pleasures. The aspect like virtue and knowledge matters a lot when it comes to the issue of psychological pleasures of a human being. If a person has knowledge and good character he can gain self confidence and self realization which is far more superior to physical pleasure. . A mans life should very well reflect morality, coyness and sacrifice. These elements might not give pleasure to a person, but they indeed prove his character to be valuable and divine. Moreover, acquiring knowledge requires hard work and the benefit of being knowledgeable is that one acquires wisdom. To acquire wisdom, one must go through various experiences in life and these actions are mostly less pleasure giving. For example, Socrates was a great Greek philosopher, who led an extremely simple life. He Life was not at all luxurious but his knowledge and virtue was par excellence. He never attached any action to achieve happiness but followed justice and morality. He experienced real psychogenic happiness in practicing virtue and ethics but did not opt for physical pleasure as he defined senses as illusionary. Objection Two Another objection is that,